Friday, January 30, 2015

Reading #2---Trent 1475; Stories Of A Ritual Murder Trial


This time the reading is mighty interesting and very sad. Here is a long summary:
 

It all started with a boy named Simon. He went missing when he was “not quite two and a half” (Hsia) years old. His Christians parents, asked the Bishop Johannes Hinderbach for help when Simon’s father and his friends could not find the little boy after searching the city premises. There were already rumors of Jews kidnapping and killing Christian children during the “holy feast days” and thus the Jewish homes were searched by the podestà but the child was not seen. The next day however, little Simon was found dead in the ditch, leading to the house of a Jew family in Trent.

Simon’s alleged murder occurred during the Passover of 1475 in Trent. In 1475, that week was considered a “holy feast days” by both Christians and Jews because Passover and Easter were happening a few days after one another. Such timing was significant because, in the eyes of the Christians and Magistrates, the death of Simon nicely coincides with Passover, the Jewish celebration. Thus, it was not very long before the authorities linked the two together, by accusing the Jews of performing a ritual murder on Simon, during the mentioned Jewish celebration.

A picture of St. Simon of Trent. Or what Hiderbach claimed to have happened to him during Passover.

The unfortunate Jews who were involved in the upcoming tragedy could be categorized into 3 households. Samuel’s household, with ten adults and one child, Tobias’s household, with six adults and four children and finally, Engel’s household, with six adults and three children. Members of households are families, friends and acquaintances who happened to lodge in that household during Passover.

After the discovery of the body, all of the men were arrested while the women and children were placed under house arrest. The men were separated and then interrogated with torture, at different times. The magistrates’ coercion method was simple. The magistrates ignored everything that they didn’t want to hear and just keep questioning and torturing the Jews until they said what the magistrates wanted to hear. Before long everyone more or less ‘confess’ to have participated in the alleged ritual murder of Simon.

After the men, the magistrates turn towards the Jewish women who were under house arrest. At this point in time, many of the Jewish men had tried to protect their families, especially the women and children, by telling the magistrates that the women did not participate in the actual murder of the boy and that the younger children were ignorant of this ‘ritual’. However, that did not stop the magistrates from interrogating them. The women were questioned and if their answers were not consistent with the “truth” that the men had said, the women would be tortured.

However, women were always perceived as the weaker sex and the magistrates could not treat them as harshly as the Jewish males. For example, in November of 1475, the “trial” for the Jewish women had to be postponed because the magistrates received heavy criticism by the authorities in Rome who disapprove with the idea of torturing a woman. The women were also asked if they were pregnant, because the magistrates were not allowed to torture pregnant women. The women also received less punishment as they turned “the gender separation in worship to their advantage, the women represented themselves primarily in their domestic roles as only partial participants in religious rites…” (Hsia) such as the blood libel. In the end, thanks to these attributes, women were “under less pressure to conform to the image of the demonic Jew” (Hsia). The women were still tortured but none was executed.

Out of the 22 Jewish adults, 16 were executed at different times, with different methods of execution. The head of the three households; Samuel, Tobias, Engel, with 3 more Jewish men, were tied to the stake and burned alive. For the rest of the Jew men, 2 committed suicides in prison, 2 were hanged at the gallows, and another 2 were broken at the wheel and then burned. The last 4 asked for baptism before death and they received a more ‘humane’ execution method, where 2 of them were beheaded while the other 2 were hanged. Only men were executed.

The Gallows

Burning of Jews
The Wheel

There were many political forces behind this incident and most of them revolve around the prince-bishop Hinderbach. He was the one turned Simon into the “Blessed Simon Martyr” and promoted Simon’s cult to the Christians. Under Hinderbach’s encouragement, the story of Simon’s “martyrdom” spread through poems, hymns, sermons and more. Next, the “Book of miracles of the Blessed Simon Martyr of Trent” was published with 129 miracles attributed to Simon and soon enough, pilgrimages to Trent started making Simon’s cult became well known.

Ultimately, Hinderbach probably needed Simon’s cult to thrive so that he could justify his persecution of Jews to the pope, the doges and other Roman authorities. Many other power plays, involving powerful leaders of countries and other powerful authoritative figures, ensued before and even long after these executions had been carried out. And to think that all of this was caused by a single Christian toddler who died during Passover of 1475.

Works Cited

Hsia, R. Po-Chia. Trent 1475; Stories Of A Ritual Murder Trial . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.

PS: I do not own any of these pictures. Got them from:

 


Monday, January 19, 2015

Reading #1---Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity


STIGMA.

Picture from:

A stigmatized person is more or less an outcast. Previously, a stigma literally refers to a sign of disgrace that one had on their body. But the stigma that we know today refers more to the disgraceful characteristic than an actual physical mark.  According to Goffman, The phenomenon whereby an individual with an attribute which is deeply discredited by his/her society is rejected as a result of the attribute. Stigma is a process by which the reaction of others spoils normal identity” (Goffman, 1963). Today, a stigma is both visible and invisible to our naked eyes. Even then, once a person is identified to posses a stigma, he or she will immediately be perceived, more often than not, negatively, and according to the stigma they posses. In his book Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Goffman categorized the stigmas into 3 different types:
1.     Stigma of character traits
·      A stigma based on your ‘unnatural’ behavior, e.g.: homosexuality, alcoholism, suicidal attempts, mental disorder, etc.
2.     Physical stigma
·      A stigma based on your physical appearance, such as; disabilities/deformities, blemishes, weight, etc.
3.     Tribal stigma
·      A stigma based on your race, nationality, religion or ethnic background.

Picture from:

Incidentally, a stigma wouldn’t be complete without a stigma symbol. Stigma symbols are the visuals that are used to brand or label a stigmatized person. Some examples of these stigma symbols that Goffman gave in his book were, skin colour, hearing aids and wheelchairs. There are many more examples of stigma symbols in our society. Looking back in history, the society have already been using these stigma symbols to negatively label people since as early as the 13th century, when the fourth Lateran council required Jews to wear something on their clothes to identify themselves (canon 68). By 16th century, the secular government demanded the Jews to wear a yellow symbol or Jew hats (stigma symbol) to differentiate themselves. Other examples of stigma symbols in history were, the yellow/red ribbons that prostitutes were expected to wear and the identifiable tunics and hand-held torches that the church forced the heretics to wear during public shaming.

Picture from: http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/beyond-the-pale/eng_captions/11-3.html




So how can a stigmatized person hide his stigma? One method is to use a disindentifier. A disindentifier is something that stops or deflects the immediate association between the stigmatized person and the stigma itself. These are acts that stigma-bearers did to cover up their stigma in the society and attempt to ‘pass’ as a ‘normal’ person. Examples of disindentifier are, when a homosexual tells ‘queer jokes’ to pass as a heterosexual person or, as given in the book, when an educated black man ‘loses’ his ‘good English’ when he was visiting the South. While some of these methods may work, this method is usually harmful to the stigma-bearer. The stigmatized person might get depressed or simply gets drained from trying too hard to be ‘normal’.

Picture from:

After learning about stigma, a question popped in my head: How would we know if we ourselves, posses a stigma or not? My answer to this question is that we don’t get to decide it ourselves. Instead we wait and see if OTHER people will give us a stigma or not. It’s sad to say that we don’t define ourselves. It is what others have to say about us, that truly matters. I’m not sure if the societies hundreds of years ago are different than now, but for us living in this century, what define us are the opinions of everybody else, except ourselves.

Picture from:

Some thoughts on Stigma:
In our society today, we don’t really have to be visually different than other people to ‘have’ a stigma. Therefore, how can we tell the difference between the ‘normal’ and those who have stigmata? Is it important to differentiate the two? And how exactly are we supposed to act around a stigmatized person? Ignore them? Give them a ‘special’ treatment because of their stigma? Or act as if they do not posses a stigma? What do the majority of the society have to do to make sure that these people wont be out-casted? 
Picture from: